On Campus
by
Peter Caruso
23 March, 2004
IN DESCRIBING terrorists´ general state of sanity, terrorism
expert Scott Atran once said, "These people showed no sign of
psycho pathology." In other words, they did not appear to be
crazy.
Mr Atran, a leading scientist at the National Centre for Scientific
Research in Paris and at the University of Michigan, considered
it to be usual for terrorists to come from middle to upper-class
families, and on face value, appear to be relatively normal individuals.
With this in mind, is it feasible that terrorists could be walking
among us in the streets, train stations and shopping centres of
Perth? Is our city one of the world's so-called "soft targets"
for a group of well-financed, well-mannered terrorists? Could the
unsuspecting public have a well-organised terrorist cell developing
right under its very nose?
Highly doubtful, one may think, when you consider WA's geographical
isolation and relative unimportance compared to high profile cities
under the world wide terrorism spotlight. But in light of the "catch
a soft target by surprise" strategy that al-Qa'ida and its
affiliates have been deploying, sleepy Perth, just perhaps, becomes
a more attractive target.
According to Clive Williams, Director of Terrorism Studies at Australian
National University, Australia's alliance with the US in the Iraq
war has catapulted Australia's position as a terrorist target.
"My belief is that with Iraq, Australia went up into the top
four of preferred al-Qa'ida targets (after the US, Israel and the
UK)."
"Al-Qa'ida has to have a cell structure and operational capability
in place before it mounts an attack. We know that there have been
attempts to set up cells here for future attacks."
Perth's potential targets include the central railway station,
Subiaco Oval, the domestic and international airports, the American
and British consulates, Fremantle harbour, the SAS Swanbourne barracks,
Garden Island Navy base and the Kwinana oil refinery.
Mr Williams´ post-Madrid bombings comments have been echoed
elsewhere. In an interview with ABC's Lateline program, Rohan Gunaratna,
terrorism expert and the acknowledged authority on the al-Qa'ida
network, said, "It is true that Jemaah Islamiah has suffered
in South-East Asia but still it retains significant capability to
mount attacks. Jemaah Islamiah and al-Qa'ida both have intentions
of attacking Australia."
In the aftermath of the train bombs that took more than 200 lives
in Madrid, attention has turned to other countries that joined the
US-lead coalition of the willing.
Australia ranks as a high profile partner. That said, Mr Williams
offers some cause for optimism.
"So far we seem to have been on top of the situation, helped
particularly by our geography. Spain, which was further down the
list, but probably in the top ten, was a much softer target because
of its porous borders and large Muslim immigrant community."
Within easy reach or not, the fact remains that in the minds of
terrorists, we form part of the so-called Zionist-Christian enemy.
A leading expert on terror, Jessica Stern, has attempted to tap
into the minds of terrorists. The National Security Council director
for Russian, Ukrainian, and Eurasian Affairs in the Clinton administration,
Ms Stern spent five years interviewing them.
When asked to describe jihad (holy war), many terrorists referred
to it as "addictive". Reasons for them turning to terrorism
included alienation, humiliation and lack of political and economic
opportunities. Violent extremism becomes even more attractive when
jihad can be funded by untraceable flows of finance via covert or
illicit foreign exchange transactions.
All the evidence, however, suggests that being a follower of a
radical terrorist agenda does not mean you have to be mentally disturbed.
Alleged mastermind of the Madrid bombings, Jamal Zougam, and his
half-brother Mohamed Chaoui, were not perceived as shady characters.
Their Spanish next-door neighbours, shocked at their arrests, saw
them and their family as charming, modern neighbours. Mohamed Bekkali,
also arrested over the bombings, had only one known obsession -
he was a fanatical supporter of the Real Madrid soccer team.
The general agreement amongst authorities in the field of terrorism
is that terrorists are no different psychologically from anyone
else. They do what they do to achieve a desired result. This is
highlighted by terrorist leaders, who have demonstrated repeated
evidence that they are not in any way mentally ill.
What they do show are strong abilities in strategy and planning,
as well as highly fanatical ideologies. Whilst the psyche of every
terrorist is distinct, a common trait is their marginal personalities
and extreme inner anger. They are also highly driven by political,
ethno-national and hard-line religious motives.
The job of combating terrorism becomes particularly difficult when
religious motivations are factored into the equation. The violence
they deploy is not seen as a means to an end, but rather an end
in itself. An US-style war on terror, therefore, can only fuel this
violence, and promote terrorist recruitment.
The Bush Administration's unilateral approach has so far proved
to be largely counter-productive. But is there an alternative approach?
Some experts believe the best way to fight terrorists is to ensure
that they do not receive the popular pockets of support that they
thrive on. After all, the fact that they maintain this support suggests
that their tactics are applauded and that they bask in the public
limelight.
One way of reducing this support is through addressing the issues
that are creating terrorism. The Palestinian problem and the Chechen
problem top that list.
In years to come, when we reflect on the battle against what some
commentators are calling the "al-Qa'ida franchise", there
may be regrets on the way the terrorist problem was tackled.
The power of the crystal ball we never had. The lessons we should
have learned. What we should have done to gain a better understanding
of the mind of a terrorist.
The idea of a crystal ball reflection some time in the future may
not seem much help in the current climate of terrorist threats.
Today you might be wandering down the street, and you observe a
man of Arabic origin with a backpack strapped to his body pass you
by. You grip your young daughter's hand and quickly move on.
You then step into your local corner deli to buy a carton of milk,
and a polite middle-eastern man smiles at you from behind the counter
as he hands you the change.
You then return to the safety of your home, two doors away, all
the while thinking "maybe I'm living next door to terrorists."
By placing the suspicious eye upon our Muslim community, the vast
majority of whom are, of course, good standing, law-abiding people,
rich in moral fibre and sickened by terrorist violence, we face
the risk of turning our society into a collective of paranoid xenophobes.
One must take into account that a terrorist is a highly rare breed
indeed. Remain vigilant, yes, but paranoia has no place in our multicultural
playground called Perth.
|